Aezakmi Review 2026: Honest Pros, Cons and Pricing
Aezakmi Review 2026: Honest Pros, Cons and Pricing
Aezakmi launched out of the Russian-speaking affiliate marketing community around 2019 and has been quietly expanding its English-language presence ever since. It sits in a crowded field, browsers like Multilogin, AdsPower, and Dolphin Anty compete for the same buyer, but Aezakmi has carved a niche as the scrappier, cheaper option for operators who need functional fingerprint isolation without the Multilogin bill. The vendor’s site is aezakmi.run, and the product is Chromium-based, which means you get a familiar browsing environment with a layer of fingerprint management bolted on top.
The target audience is affiliate marketers running paid social (Facebook, TikTok, Google), e-commerce arbitrageurs managing multiple store accounts, and airdrop farmers who need to keep dozens of wallets cleanly separated, a use case that the folks at airdropfarming.org/blog/ cover in depth. Aezakmi is not aimed at enterprise compliance teams or corporate browser isolation use cases. It is aimed squarely at operators who live in Telegram groups and measure ROI in cost per profile.
My verdict up front: Aezakmi earns its place as a budget-tier option for solo operators and small teams on Windows. It covers the fingerprint vectors that matter most, the pricing is reasonable, and the free tier is genuinely useful for testing. Where it falls short is documentation, Mac stability, and automation depth. If you can live with those limitations, it is a reasonable buy. If you cannot, the alternatives section below is worth reading before you commit.
what Aezakmi actually does
At its core, Aezakmi creates isolated browser profiles, each with its own spoofed fingerprint, cookie store, local storage, and proxy assignment. When you open two profiles in Aezakmi, each one presents a distinct identity to any website running fingerprinting scripts. This matters because modern platforms do not rely solely on cookies to track and link accounts. They sample Canvas API pixel output, WebGL renderer strings, audio context processing signatures, installed font lists, screen resolution, timezone, and WebRTC IP leak behaviour. A tool that only rotates user agents is not anti-detect in any meaningful sense.
Aezakmi addresses the main fingerprint vectors: Canvas noise injection, WebGL vendor and renderer spoofing, WebRTC IP leak prevention (with options for real IP, proxy IP, or disabled), audio context fingerprint randomisation, and font enumeration masking. TLS fingerprinting, which identifies the browser engine at the TCP handshake level per the IETF TLS 1.3 specification, is harder to fix for any Chromium-based tool because the engine itself controls the handshake. Aezakmi does not claim to solve TLS fingerprinting, and frankly neither do most competitors outside Multilogin’s Mimic core.
Beyond fingerprints, each profile stores its own cookies and session data, integrates a proxy (HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5) per profile, and can be grouped into folders for team organisation. There is a cookie bot feature for warming profiles by simulating browsing behaviour before an account is used. The automation layer is built on Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), so Selenium, Playwright, and Puppeteer scripts can connect to running profiles, though the documentation on doing this is thin.
pricing
As of May 2026, Aezakmi’s pricing is structured around profile caps and seat counts. The free plan gives you 10 profiles with no time limit, which is genuinely useful for evaluation. The paid tiers are approximately:
- Team 100: around $15/month for up to 100 profiles and 2 team seats
- Team 300: around $30/month for up to 300 profiles and 5 team seats
- Team 1000: around $75/month for up to 1,000 profiles and 10 team seats
- Unlimited: custom pricing, contact sales
Annual billing typically carries a 20% discount. These figures are based on the current published rates at aezakmi.run and may change. Always verify on their pricing page before purchasing. Compared to Multilogin’s base plan which starts at $99/month for 100 profiles, Aezakmi’s Team 100 is a significant saving if the feature set meets your needs.
There are no per-seat add-ons or metered API call charges on standard plans. The team seat limits are the binding constraint if you are running a larger operation, something worth modelling before you upgrade.
what works
fingerprint coverage is solid for the price. Canvas, WebGL, WebRTC, audio context, and font masking are all handled. I ran profiles through Cover Your Tracks (EFF) and saw distinct fingerprint signatures across simultaneously open profiles. For the price point, this is the level of coverage most affiliate operators actually need.
the free tier is genuinely usable. Ten profiles with no time limit is more than enough to test workflows, validate proxy configurations, or run a small operation while you evaluate whether to commit to a paid plan. Most competitors either cap the free tier at 3-5 profiles or time-limit it to 7-14 days. Aezakmi’s free tier is a genuine differentiator.
proxy integration is straightforward. You assign a proxy per profile (HTTP, HTTPS, or SOCKS5) at creation time and can update it without recreating the profile. It works cleanly with residential, datacenter, and mobile proxy providers. If you are sourcing Singapore mobile proxies for geo-locked account work, singaporemobileproxy.com pairs well with Aezakmi’s per-profile proxy assignment.
profile counts per plan are competitive. For $30/month you get 300 profiles. Most operators I know who run Facebook ad accounts at scale are running 50-200 profiles concurrently. The Team 300 plan covers that without needing an enterprise contract.
cookie bot reduces setup friction. Warming a fresh profile by running it through normal browsing behaviour before using it for account work is standard practice. Having this built into the tool rather than scripting it externally saves time, particularly for teams who do not have dedicated automation engineers.
what doesn’t
Mac support is inconsistent. Aezakmi’s primary development and QA has historically targeted Windows. The Mac build exists, but reported stability issues, update lag, and occasional crashes on macOS make it unreliable for production use. If your team is Mac-first, this is a serious problem. Check multiaccountops.com/blog/ for current user reports before committing.
Linux is not supported. No Linux client means any operator running headless automation on Linux VPS infrastructure needs to handle Aezakmi from a Windows host or Windows VPS. That adds cost and complexity if your automation stack is Linux-native.
English documentation is poor. The original product was built for and documented in Russian. The English translations in the help centre are clearly machine-generated in places, with incomplete API references and missing examples for common workflows like Playwright integration. If you do not read Russian, expect to spend time in community Telegram groups filling in documentation gaps.
automation API depth lags competitors. CDP connectivity works, but the wrapper layer that Aezakmi provides around it is thin compared to AdsPower’s API or Multilogin’s automation documentation. Teams who need to programmatically create, configure, and launch hundreds of profiles will hit friction that a more mature API would avoid.
no built-in profile sharing across seats. Profiles created by one team member are not automatically accessible to others in real time. The workflow for sharing profiles between team members is more manual than tools like AdsPower or Dolphin Anty that have built synchronisation into the product.
who should buy
solo affiliate operators on Windows who run 50-200 accounts and want fingerprint isolation without spending $100+/month. The free tier covers evaluation, and the Team 100 plan at $15/month is a sensible step up.
small teams (2-5 people) in the Russian-speaking affiliate marketing world who are already comfortable with the product’s community and can read original documentation. The product originated in this community and is most mature for this use case.
e-commerce arbitrageurs managing multiple Amazon, eBay, or Etsy seller accounts who need clean session isolation and simple proxy assignment per account. The cookie bot is useful here for account seasoning workflows.
airdrop and DeFi multi-wallet operators running parallel wallet interactions where fingerprint isolation between browser profiles is the main requirement and automation depth is secondary.
who should skip
Mac-primary teams. The stability issues make this a bad fit. Look at AdsPower or Dolphin Anty instead.
teams with heavy automation requirements. If your workflow depends on programmatic profile creation via API, scheduled launches, or integration with orchestration tools, Aezakmi’s thin API layer will slow you down. AdsPower or Multilogin’s API is significantly more complete.
Linux VPS operators. No Linux client means adding a Windows layer to your stack, which defeats much of the cost efficiency of running on Linux.
operators who need enterprise-level support. Aezakmi does not have the support infrastructure of larger competitors. If your business has SLA requirements or needs dedicated account management, this is not the right vendor.
alternatives to consider
Dolphin Anty is a strong Windows and Mac-compatible alternative at a similar price point, with better English documentation and a more active community outside Russian-speaking markets.
AdsPower offers a more mature automation API and better cross-platform support, at a slightly higher price tier, making it the right upgrade path when your operation outgrows Aezakmi.
Multilogin remains the reference standard for fingerprint quality, particularly for TLS fingerprinting control via its Stealthfox (Firefox) engine, but at $99+/month it is 3-6x the price of Aezakmi and harder to justify for smaller operations. Our full comparison of anti-detect browsers covers these options side by side.
You can also find practical workflow notes across the tools at proxyscraping.org/blog/ if you are pairing any of these with scraped or harvested proxy lists.
For more operator reviews and tool comparisons, see the antidetectreview.org article index.
verdict
Aezakmi is a competent, affordable anti-detect browser for Windows-first operators who need solid fingerprint isolation across Canvas, WebGL, WebRTC, and audio vectors without the price premium of Multilogin. the weak Mac support, thin English documentation, and limited automation API mean it is not the right fit for every team, but for a solo operator or small Windows-based affiliate team running under 300 profiles, it is a practical and cost-effective option. if you are on the fence, the 10-profile free tier removes the risk from testing it yourself.
Written by Xavier Fok
disclosure: this article may contain affiliate links. if you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. verdicts are independent of payouts. last reviewed by Xavier Fok on 2026-05-19.