Dolphin{anty} vs GoLogin: 2026 Head-to-Head Comparison
Dolphin{anty} vs GoLogin: 2026 Head-to-Head Comparison
If you run multiple accounts at any meaningful scale, you already know that picking the wrong antidetect browser costs you more than the subscription fee. It costs you burned accounts, proxy waste, and the hours you spend debugging fingerprint leaks. I’ve run both Dolphin{anty} and GoLogin across affiliate, e-commerce, and social media arbitrage workflows from Singapore, and neither is a clear universal winner. The answer depends almost entirely on how you manage proxies and what kind of team you’re running.
GoLogin positions itself as the approachable option: a polished UI, a built-in proxy marketplace, and a price tier that doesn’t hurt at the starter level. Dolphin{anty} is the tool of choice for traffic arbitrage teams that need automation depth and tight API control, even if the onboarding is steeper and the base plan starts higher. Both support HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 proxies, and both let you assign residential, mobile, datacenter, or ISP proxies per profile. But the way they handle proxy rotation, session persistence, and concurrent connections differs enough to matter operationally.
The short verdict: for solo operators or small teams testing the waters with residential proxies, GoLogin wins on cost and simplicity. For mid-to-large arbitrage teams that need API-driven automation, custom proxy rotation logic, and deep team permissioning, Dolphin{anty} pulls ahead. Read on for the full breakdown.
TL;DR comparison table
| Feature | Dolphin{anty} | GoLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | 10 profiles | 3 profiles |
| Entry paid plan | ~$89/mo (Base, 100 profiles) | ~$24/mo (Starter, 100 profiles) |
| Built-in proxy marketplace | No | Yes (residential & mobile) |
| Proxy types supported | HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5 | HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5 |
| API access | All paid plans | Professional+ (~$49/mo) |
| Team collaboration | All paid plans | Business+ (~$99/mo) |
| Browser engine | Chromium (custom) | Orbita (Chromium fork) |
| Mobile profile emulation | Yes | Yes |
| Session persistence | Profile-level | Profile-level |
| Best for | Arbitrage teams, API automation | Solo ops, small teams, beginners |
| Target user | Advanced/team operators | Beginner to intermediate |
| Support | Telegram community + email | Live chat + email |
Dolphin{anty} at a glance
Dolphin{anty} launched around 2021 and carved out a strong following among Facebook and TikTok Ads arbitrage teams, particularly in Russian-speaking markets. It runs on a custom Chromium build and generates browser fingerprints that closely mirror real devices. The interface is dense but organized: you manage profiles in bulk, assign proxies inline, and can tag or group profiles by campaign or team member.
The proxy integration in Dolphin{anty} is intentionally flexible. You paste in proxy strings (or use their import format), assign one proxy per profile, and the tool handles the connection at the profile level. There’s no built-in proxy shop, which means you’re sourcing your own residential or mobile proxies externally. That’s a constraint for beginners but a feature for experienced operators who already have preferred providers and don’t want vendor lock-in. The API is available on all paid plans, which is a meaningful edge over GoLogin if you’re scripting profile creation or automating proxy rotation through your own stack.
Pricing runs higher than GoLogin at every tier. The Base plan is roughly $89/month for 100 profiles. The Team plan, which adds proper role-based access, runs around $159/month for 300 profiles. There’s a free tier with 10 profiles, which is generous enough to validate whether the fingerprinting approach works for your use case before committing. Read the full Dolphin{anty} review for a deeper look at the automation layer.
GoLogin at a glance
GoLogin has been around since 2019 and has put significant effort into the product experience side of things. The Orbita browser engine (their Chromium fork) generates fingerprints that consistently pass major antidetect test sites. The UI is cleaner than Dolphin{anty}, and the onboarding is noticeably faster for someone who hasn’t used an antidetect browser before.
The standout feature GoLogin added a few years back is the built-in proxy marketplace. You can purchase residential or mobile proxy traffic directly from within the platform without leaving to set up a separate provider account. Pricing in the marketplace is competitive for small volumes, though once you’re running serious scale you’ll almost certainly get better rates by going direct to a residential proxy provider. The free plan offers 3 profiles, which is limited but usable for testing. The Starter plan at around $24/month for 100 profiles is the lowest entry point among credible antidetect browsers.
One area where GoLogin lags is API access and team features. The API is only available on Professional and above (around $49/month), and meaningful team collaboration features require the Business plan at around $99/month. For solo operators that’s fine. For a team of 5+ running separate campaigns, those tier jumps add up quickly. See the full GoLogin review for a breakdown of how the fingerprinting holds up under heavier scrutiny.
Head-to-head
IP pool size
Neither Dolphin{anty} nor GoLogin is a proxy provider. They don’t maintain IP pools themselves. GoLogin’s built-in marketplace sources residential and mobile IPs through partner networks, and the pool size is not publicly disclosed by GoLogin. Dolphin{anty} has no marketplace at all. What matters here is which external proxy providers you pair with each tool. Both accept standard proxy formats, so you’re not locked into any particular IP pool. If you’re running at scale and sourcing your own proxies, this is a non-difference. If you’re a beginner who wants everything in one place, GoLogin’s marketplace is a practical advantage.
Rotation control
Dolphin{anty} gives you more granular control over how and when you rotate proxies, particularly if you’re using the API. You can script profile updates to swap proxies on a schedule, assign proxies by tag, and build rotation logic into your automation layer. GoLogin’s rotation is more manual at the UI level and limited by API access being restricted to higher plans. For simple use cases, both are fine. For programmatic rotation across hundreds of profiles, Dolphin{anty} wins.
Geo coverage
Again, this depends on your proxy provider choice rather than the antidetect browser itself. Both tools accept proxies from any provider and let you spoof matching geolocation data in the browser fingerprint, including timezone, language, and locale. The important thing is that you match your proxy geo to the fingerprint geo consistently. Both tools let you do this, though Dolphin{anty}’s bulk profile editing makes it easier to set geo parameters across large profile batches. GoLogin’s UI makes individual profile geo configuration simpler for beginners.
Connection success rate
Connection success rate is largely determined by proxy quality, not the browser. That said, fingerprint quality matters for platform-level detection, and both browsers perform well on standard fingerprint audit tools like BrowserLeaks and CreepJS. Based on my own testing across Meta Ads and e-commerce platforms, both browsers hold up under normal operating conditions. GoLogin had a period in 2023 where its canvas fingerprint had some consistency issues that were later patched. As of early 2026 both tools are comparable on fingerprint integrity. The SOCKS5 proxy protocol itself is well-standardized, and both tools implement it correctly.
Speed
Both browsers are Chromium-based and feel similar in terms of raw page load performance. Dolphin{anty} has historically been heavier on RAM when running many concurrent profiles, which matters if you’re on a mid-range VPS. GoLogin’s Orbita engine has been optimized for lower memory usage in recent versions. For operators running 50+ concurrent profiles on a single machine, this difference is measurable. For casual multi-account use, it’s not noticeable.
Pricing per GB
Neither tool charges per GB of proxy traffic. You pay a flat subscription for profile capacity. The proxy traffic costs go to your external proxy provider. GoLogin’s marketplace does charge per GB for proxy traffic purchased through their platform, with residential traffic typically priced in the range of $3-5 per GB as of early 2026, which is roughly market rate. If you’re buying large volumes, direct provider contracts will be cheaper. Dolphin{anty} has no per-GB costs at all since there’s no marketplace.
Session persistence
Both tools store profile state persistently between sessions. Cookies, local storage, browsing history, and proxy assignments are tied to individual profiles and survive browser restarts. This is table stakes for any serious antidetect browser at this point. The implementation is solid in both tools. GoLogin’s cloud sync feature lets you access profiles across devices, which Dolphin{anty} also supports for paid plans. For teams where multiple people need to hand off the same profile, cloud sync is important, and both tools handle it adequately.
Concurrent connections
Dolphin{anty} allows concurrent profile launches on all paid plans, with limits based on your machine’s hardware. GoLogin similarly allows concurrent sessions. The practical ceiling is your RAM and CPU, not an artificial software limit in either tool. I’ve run 80+ concurrent GoLogin profiles on a 32GB RAM server without issues. Dolphin{anty} requires more RAM per profile in my experience, which becomes a factor at high concurrency. If concurrent capacity matters to your workflow, factor that hardware overhead into your infrastructure budget.
Use-case verdicts
Facebook/TikTok Ads arbitrage teams. Dolphin{anty} wins. The API access on base plans, bulk profile management, and the deep integration with automation tools like Octo Browser scripts or custom Python stacks make it the standard choice for arbitrage shops in Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe. The higher price is justified at team scale.
Airdrop farming and Web3 multi-wallet ops. GoLogin wins for small operators, Dolphin{anty} for serious farms. If you’re running 10-30 wallets for airdrop campaigns, GoLogin’s starter plan covers it at lower cost. For larger farms, the automation layer in Dolphin{anty} is worth the price delta. There’s a solid breakdown of the proxy setup patterns used in these workflows over at multiaccountops.com/blog.
E-commerce seller accounts (Amazon, eBay, Etsy). GoLogin wins for most operators. The simpler interface, lower cost, and adequate fingerprint quality cover the majority of e-commerce multi-account use cases. The built-in proxy marketplace is convenient when you’re just starting out and don’t have established proxy provider relationships.
Social media management agencies. Either tool works, but GoLogin’s team collaboration pricing is a problem once you scale. At 5+ team members needing account access, you hit the Business tier at $99/month. Dolphin{anty} includes team features at the Team plan level ($159/month) with better role-based permissions. For agencies managing 50+ client accounts, Dolphin{anty}’s team workflow is more mature. Proxy management for social media accounts specifically benefits from consistent residential IPs, and both tools integrate cleanly with providers like Bright Data or Oxylabs.
Who should pick Dolphin{anty}
Pick Dolphin{anty} if you’re running a team of 3 or more people on a shared set of profiles, you need API access to automate profile creation and proxy rotation, you already have proxy provider relationships and don’t need a marketplace, or your workflow involves heavy automation scripts rather than manual browsing. The higher price is a real barrier at the solo level, but at team scale the per-seat economics work out and the API depth pays for itself in automation time saved.
Who should pick GoLogin
Pick GoLogin if you’re solo or a 2-person team, you want to get started without sourcing proxies from a separate provider, your use cases are straightforward (social media management, a few e-commerce accounts), or you’re evaluating antidetect browsers for the first time and want a gentler learning curve. The Starter plan at $24/month is one of the most accessible entry points in the space, and the Orbita browser fingerprinting quality is solid enough for most standard platforms. GoLogin also has more English-language documentation and support resources, which matters if you’re not in a Russian-speaking community where Dolphin{anty} support is concentrated.
Verdict overall
There’s no single winner here, and anyone telling you otherwise is simplifying the decision. Dolphin{anty} is the stronger tool for team-scale, automation-heavy operations where proxy control and API access matter. GoLogin is the better starting point for individuals and small teams who want capable fingerprinting at a lower price point with less friction. Proxy compatibility is a non-issue for either tool, both support every major proxy type and work with any external provider you bring to the table.
The real decision point is automation depth versus accessibility. If you’re scripting your workflows and managing hundreds of profiles, Dolphin{anty}’s API and team features are worth the premium. If you’re managing dozens of profiles manually, GoLogin’s UI and pricing make more practical sense. According to GoLogin’s own documentation, the platform has continued to expand its fingerprint database to include more mobile device profiles, which is increasingly relevant as platforms push mobile-first detection. Dolphin{anty}’s help center has detailed documentation on proxy string formats and bulk import workflows that reflect how operationally deep the tool goes.
Start with GoLogin’s free plan to validate the fingerprinting approach, then upgrade to Dolphin{anty} when your team and automation needs outgrow what GoLogin’s lower tiers offer. That migration path makes more sense than overbuying on day one.
Written by Xavier Fok
disclosure: this article may contain affiliate links. if you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. verdicts are independent of payouts. last reviewed by Xavier Fok on 2026-05-19.